The United Kingdom is one of the few developed countries in the world without a written constitution. However, its economy is booming, as it strengthens its position as one of the richest countries in the world. In addition to it is hinged at the federal level, despite its relatively small landmass and population geography. This raises the fundamental issue of governance mechanisms, if any, as the United Kingdom has been stored in this form, and how they can continue to thrive today without a definitively established legal system?

The United Kingdom is in contrast to most other nations in the world because it has not undergone major constitutional changes since the middle Ages. He has since been largely dominated by a monarch in parliament. That said, it proved to be successful through the ages, without the strict written form, which many countries have adopted. From what has prompted unprecedented flexibility and the United Kingdom has effectively developed its own (non-binding) constitutional conventions to keep the country afloat. In addition, the bicameral (or dual-chamber) of parliament and the monarchy serves as the ratifications required to provide a comprehensive set of checks and balances that would otherwise be provided through a written constitution.

The assertion that the United Kingdom has no constitution is misleading. Of course, there is no written record, but the UK has a rich tapestry factory and various legal problems and has been for centuries. This fluidity has to adapt, if necessary, and allowed the UK to thrive and grow where others have not had the chance. Behind the scenes is a code of wrought iron pipe and strict, which may be partly derived from the codes of practice, acts of Parliament and & bits and other parts. Although you cannot ask for this Constitution to effect a single final document, the UK certainly works on the basis of a constitution that keeps the country running on a daily basis.

Much of the British constitution is the full legislative process for legal adoption. Any bill must first be proposed to the House of Commons, an elected body of representative’s responsible power to initiate legislation. The first chamber is to propose legislation and rules of debate in-depth, before agreement on a final draft to go to the second chamber, known as the House of Lords. House of Lords is largely non-elected, with buy; from generation to generation, or new members as proposed by the House of Commons. They have veto power and the ability to return to the first room of their proposed amendments to bills. This guarantees not to rush the legislation passes, and in theory, should cover all possibilities. After passing both chambers, is due to the sovereign, who has a personal responsibility to ensure all legislation in conformity with the will and is morally justified. Although the monarch did not use his veto, the 17th century is still an important constitutional safeguard in the United Kingdom.

The constitution of the United Kingdom does not seem obvious at first glance, but it is certainly a complex web of governance and the practice extends below its white exterior. It has been characterized as the most successful constitution in the world, and this is reinforced by its perpetual success and without problems from the beginning of its evolution.